Planning Cases & Statutory Workflow
Planning cases tracked through nine explicit states from data collection to committee review, with tasks, deadlines and reminders — so delay becomes measurable rather than anecdotal.
A statutory procedure, tracked as one.
Each planning case carries its own number, description, assigned manager, target completion date, municipality and the planning authority handling it — and moves through an explicit sequence of states rather than accumulating status notes.
Delay becomes something you can measure.
New → data collection → initial review → planning submission → municipality review → committee review → approved, rejected or completed. Because the state is structured, “which projects are delayed” is a report rather than a conversation, and upcoming deadlines can be surfaced on the dashboard before they matter.
- Explicit status and current phase on every case
- Tasks with assignee, due date, priority and five states
- Upcoming deadlines on the executive dashboard
- Automated reminders rather than relied-upon memory
- Active, delayed and completed project reports
It manages the practice. It does not practise.
This is a practice-management and archive system. It tracks where a planning procedure has got to and holds the documents that prove it — it does not give legal advice, does not determine a planning outcome, and is not a connection to a statutory planning register. The status in the system is the practice’s own record of the procedure, which is exactly what makes it useful and exactly where its authority ends.